|
Table of Contents
6 Figures and Tables
8 Executive Summary
10 Key Findings and Implications
13 Immunoassay Dashboard
17 Immunoassay Market Opportunity Matrix
18 Survey Methodology
20 Survey Invitation Text
21 Respondent Demographics
33 Frequency of Performance of Life Science Techniques
38 Frequency of Performance of Immunoassay Methods
52 Reaction Throughput and Market Segment Growth Rates
62 Respondent's Stated Price Per Reaction
65 Total Market Size, Market Segment Sizes and Total Market Growth Rate
67 Market Shares by Segment (Share of Mention)
75 Customer Satisfaction And Interest In Switching Suppliers
81 Product Features That Influence Purchasing Decisions
84 Primary Downstream Applications and Use of Proteins
89 Desired Changes to Immunoassay Products
95 Appendix: Survey Questionnaire and Legend Table
Figures and Tables
23 Figure 1: Respondent's Place of Employment
25 Figure 2: Respondent's Country/Region
27 Figure 3: Respondent's Job Title
29 Figure 4: Respondent's Areas of Expertise/Specialization
32 Figure 5: Number of Employees in Respondent's Laboratories
35 Figure 6: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Life Science
Techniques at Least a Few Times per Year
40 Figure 7: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various
Immunoassay Methods
41 Figure 8: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Immunoassay
Methods by Organization Type
42 Figure 9: Percentage of Respondents Performing Additional Protein Related
Methods At Least Once Every Six Months
43 Figure 10: Percentage of Respondents that Perform Standard Colorimetric
or Chemiluminescent ELISAs
44 Figure 11: Percentage of Respondents that Perform Fluorescent ELISAs
45 Figure 12: Percentage of Respondents that Perform
Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays
46 Figure 13: Percentage of Respondents that Perform Bead-based
Immunoassays
72 Figure 14: Respondent's Use of LUMINEX Bead-based Immunoassays
73 Figure 15: Respondent's Primary Supplier of LUMINEX X-MAP Technology
77 Figure 16: Respondent Satisfaction with Immunoassay Methods
83 Figure 17: Most Important Features of Products for Protein Analysis
88 Figure 18: Respondent's Use of Protein Classes/Categories
30 Table 1: Respondent's Areas of Expertise/Specialization (Values for Figures 4)
36 Table 2: Frequency of Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
37 Table 3: Frequency of Co-Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
47 Table 4: Frequency of Performance of Immunoassay Methods
48 Table 5: Immunoassay Reagent Preference
50 Table 6: Frequency of Co-Performance of Life Science Techniques with
Immunoassay Methods
51 Table 7: Frequency of Co-Performance of Immunoassay Methods with
Life Science Techniques
54 Table 8: Median, Average and Trim Mean Monthly Throughput for
Immunoassay Experiments
55 Table 9: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Numbers of
Immunoassay Reactions Per Month
57 Table 10: Projected Growth in the Performance of Various
Immunoassay Methods
64 Table 11: Median, Mean and Trim Mean Price Per Data Point
for Immunoassays
66 Table 12: Estimated Market Size for Immunoassays
69 Table 13: Respondent's Primary Supplier of Immunoassay Methods
71 Table 14: Market Share Leaders for Immunoassays
78 Table 15: Percentage of Respondents Satisfied with Various Immunoassay
Methods and Reasons for Dissatisfaction
80 Table 16: Percentage of Respondents That Have Switched Suppliers
in the Last Six Months
86 Table 17: Respondent's Primary Focus/Application of Protein Analysis
Research Using Immunoassays
|