|
Table
of Contents
9 Executive Summary
11 Key Findings and Implications
15 Gene Expression Profiling Dashboard
19 Gene Expression Profiling Market Opportunity Matrix
21 Survey Methodology
23 Survey Invitation Text
24 Respondent Demographics
37 Frequency of Performance of Life Science Techniques
42 Frequency of Performance of Gene Expression Profiling
Methods
58 Reaction Throughput and Market Growth Rates
65 Respondent’s Stated Price Per Reaction
68 Total Market Size, Market Segment Sizes and Total
Market Growth Rate
70 Market Shares by Segment (Share of Mention)
84 Customer Satisfaction And Interest In Switching Suppliers
89 Product Features That Influence Purchasing Decisions
93 Primary Downstream Applications
113 Desired Changes to Gene Expression Profiling Products
120 Survey Questionnaire
Figures and Tables
26 Figure 1: Respondent’s Place of Employment
28 Figure 2: Respondent’s Country/Region
30 Figure 3: Respondent’s Job Title
32 Figure 4A: Respondent’s Areas of Expertise/Specialization
33 Figure 4B: Respondent’s Areas of Expertise/Specialization
(Molecular
Biology
Excluded)
36 Figure 5: Number of Employees in Respondent’s
Laboratories
39 Figure 6: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various
Techniques at
Least
a Few Times per Year
44 Figure 7: Percentage of Respondents Performing Gene
Expression
Profiling Experiments
45 Figure 8: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various
Gene
Expression Profiling Techniques at Least a Few Times
per Year
47 Figure 9: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Microarray-Based
Gene Expression Studies
48 Figure 10: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Serial Analysis
of Gene Expression (SAGE) Studies
49 Figure 11: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Differential Gene
Expression Studies Using Multiplex PCR
50 Figure 12: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
qRT-PCR (cDNA
Template) Using Gene Specific Fluorescent Probes
51 Figure 13: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
qRT-PCR (cDNA
Template) Using Non-Specific SYBR Green
52 Figure 14: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Northern Blot Analysis
53 Figure 15: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Transcriptome
Studies Using Tiling Arrays
54 Figure 16: Percentage of Respondents That Perform
Transcriptome
Studies via Short Read Sequencing
73 Figure 17: Respondent's Primary Supplier for Microarray-Based
Gene Expression Studies
75 Figure 18: Respondent's Primary Supplier for Differential
Gene
Expression Studies Using Multiplex PCR
77 Figure 19: Respondent's Primary Supplier for qRT-PCR
(cDNA Template)
Using Gene Specific Fluorescent Probes
79 Figure 20: Respondent's Primary Supplier for qRT-PCR
(cDNA Template)
Using Non-Specific SYBR Green
81 Figure 21: Respondent's Primary Supplier for Northern
Blot Analysis
88 Figure 22: Percentage of Respondents That Have Switched
Suppliers in
the Last Six Months
91 Figure 23: Most Important Features of Products for
Gene Expression
Profiling Experiments
96 Figure 24: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for
Microarray-Based Gene Expression Studies
98 Figure 25: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for Serial
Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) Studies
100 Figure 26: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for
Differential Gene Expression Studies Using Multiplex
PCR
102 Figure 27: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for qRT-PCR
(cDNA Template) Using Gene Specific Fluorescent
Probes
104 Figure 28: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for qRT-PCR
(cDNA Template) Using Non-Specific SYBR Green
106 Figure 29: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for Northern
Blot Analysis
108 Figure 30: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for
Transcriptome Studies Using Tiling Arrays
110 Figure 31: Respondent's Primary Downstream Application
for
Transcriptome Studies via Short Read Sequencing
34 Table 1: Respondent’s Areas of Expertise/Specialization
Values for
Figures 4A and 4B
40 Table 2: Frequency of Performance of Various Techniques
41 Table 3: Frequency of Co-Performance of Various Molecular
Biology Techniques
46 Table 4: Frequency of Performance of Gene Expression
Profiling Methods
56 Table 5: Frequency of Co-Performance of Life Science
Techniques
with Gene Expression Profiling Methods
57 Table 6: Frequency of Co-Performance of Gene Expression
Profiling
Methods with Life Science Techniques
60 Table 7: Median and Average Monthly Throughput for
Gene Expression
Profiling Products
61 Table 8: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various
Numbers of
Gene Expression Profiling Reactions Per Month
62 Table 9: Highest Throughput Users: Comparison to
2007 Life
Science Dashboard
64 Table 10: Projected Growth in the Performance of
Various Gene
Expression Profiling Techniques
67 Table 11: Median and Average Price Per Prep for Gene
Expression
Profiling Products
83 Table 12: Market Share Leaders for Gene Expression
Profiling Products
86 Table 13: Percentage of Respondents Satisfied with
Various Gene
Expression Profiling Products and Reasons for
Dissatisfaction
87 Table 14: Respondent’s Interest in Switching
to a New Supplier for Gene
Expression Profiling Systems: Comparison to 2007
Life
Science Dashboard
92 Table 15: Most Important Features of Products for
Gene Expression Profiling
Experiments – Comparison to 2007 Gene Expression
Profiling Dashboard
112 Table 16: Respondents Primary Application After
Various Gene
Expression Profiling Methods
|
